Keywords
learning needs, needs analysis, healthy and active ageing, age-friendly society, education
This article is included in the Dementia Trials Ireland (DTI) and Dementia Research Network Ireland (DRNI) gateway.
This article is included in the Ageing Populations collection.
learning needs, needs analysis, healthy and active ageing, age-friendly society, education
Our society is experiencing an increase in older populations1. Those aged 65 and over currently make up 20.3% of the European population, which is expected to increase to almost one third by 21002. Increasing longevity is very welcome, but the challenges of an ageing demographic are well documented, such as a potential increased demand on health and social care systems3, reduced investment capital, rising demands on pension schemes, and decreases in labour supply4. While longevity can be associated with increasing quality of life, this is dependent on satisfactory physical, cognitive and mental health, and good relationships and social participation5. These latter factors may be a challenge in communities low in social capital, where typical family structures mean lower intergenerational support today than in the past6.
Healthy and active ageing (HAA) and age-friendly society concepts provide a multidimensional framework to not just address the challenges of an ageing demographic, but to profit from the success of greater longevity and value the potential ongoing contribution of older people to society. HAA encompasses healthy lifestyle promotion, comprising of nutritional, physical activity and social practices throughout the life course7. An age-friendly society fosters HAA by building and maintaining intrinsic capacity across the life course and enabling greater functional ability in a person of any level of capacity1. Combined, HAA and an age-friendly society involve many sectors, including but not limited to: health, transport, housing, labour, social protection, information and communication. They also require the action of many: government officials, service providers, industry professionals, civil society, older people and their representative organisations, families and friends.
A competent workforce in all sectors is needed to address the challenges and capitalise on an ageing Europe in a positive, comprehensive and meaningful way8. Crucial to educating the future workforce is assessing learning needs, to inform the development of relevant and applicable competencies and learning outcomes for educational curricula9. This scoping review aims to gain an understanding of the learning needs in HAA and age-friendly society.
Scoping reviews are an effective method to establish the extent of the research available on a particular topic, and thus identify knowledge and evidence gaps10. Therefore a scoping review will be conducted with the following objectives:
1. To identify literature concerning learning needs, learning outcomes, educational content, evaluation, or processes, with respect to healthy and active ageing and age-friendly society concepts.
2. To assess the quality of the included studies and, if indicated, generate improved evidence recommendations.
3. To ultimately inform the development of a new postgraduate degree in Active Ageing and Age Friendly Society (Project website: https://www.emma-master.eu/).
In line with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines, the initial criteria will be broad, with the intention of creating inclusion and exclusion criteria during the search process, if appropriate. To capture as much relevant data as possible, the inclusion criteria will be limited to any study which reports on student learning needs (e.g. undergraduate, postgraduate, continuing professional development) in relation to HAA and age-friendly society. In the event where a publication is deemed relevant from abstract screening, but access to the full-text is not available, authors will be contacted to request the full-text article. An overview of this criteria is found in Table 1.
Postgraduate students are of primary interest in this review; it is expected that they have a foundational knowledge of their respective field (e.g. healthcare, social care, engineering, architecture, computer science, exercise physiology, etc.) and an intention to deepen their knowledge and skills in a more specialised area. Undergraduate students are also targeted, as knowledge areas relevant to HAA can be extrapolated from undergraduate related studies. Professionals in a variety of fields developing their skill and/or knowledge base in HAA through continuing education offerings are also of interest.
This scoping review is designed to explore learning needs; defined as self-identified and personal specific interests or knowledge needs11. In addition, all elements of the educational process are included as areas of interest, such as delivery, relevance, acceptability, and education outcome. These elements can offer insight into teacher-inferred learning needs, when self-identified student learning needs are not explicitly investigated. Together, data on learning needs, education relevance/acceptability, and educational outcomes can contribute to the formulation of appropriate learning outcomes.
Learning needs will be mapped in the context of HAA. As defined earlier, HAA considers healthy lifestyle promotion, consumption and nutrition practices as well as physical and social activity throughout the life course. An age-friendly society fosters HAA by building and maintaining intrinsic capacity across the life course and enabling greater functional ability in a person of any level of capacity.
The conduct of this scoping review will follow the guidance published by the JBI10.
Electronic searches for relevant publications will be conducted in PubMed, EBSCO (Academic Search Complete), Scopus, and ASSIA, limited to publications after 1st January 2000. Grey literature sources will initially include the first 50 results, ranked for relevance, of both Google Scholar and Research Gate searches. Publications deemed relevant from title and abstract screening will be eligible for full-text screening if published in English, Slovenian, Portuguese, Finnish, German, and Greek (as per the native fluency of the research team). Additional search methods will include forward and backward citation searching of included publications. The full search strategy is outlined in Table 2; terms within a box are combined using “OR” (e.g. “student OR professional”).
Details | Free text terms [title/abstract] and thesauri terms |
---|---|
1. Population: students | Student* ti,ab. Professional ti,ab. |
2. Concept: learning needs | ((learning or education* or training or knowledge) adj need*))ti,ab. ((learning or education* or training or profession* or knowledge) adj development))ti,ab. ((learning or education* or training or knowledge) adj relevance))ti,ab. ((learning or education* or training or knowledge) adj motivation))ti,ab. ((learning or education* or training or knowledge) adj competenc*))ti,ab. ((learning or education* or training or knowledge) adj requirement*))ti,ab. ((learning or education* or training or knowledge) adj delivery))ti,ab. ((learning or education* or training) adj process))ti,ab. (barrier* N5 facilitator*) N5 learning ti,ab. Education ti,ab. Competenc* ti,ab. CPD ti,ab. Continu* professional development ti,ab. Curricul* ti,ab. |
3. Context: healthy and active ageing | ((health* or success* or active or positive or productive or vital or resilient or robust or optimal or competent or effective or good or independent or authentic or strategic) adj aging~))ti,ab. ((assist* living or assist* technolog*) AND aging~) NOT machine learning))ti,ab. (aging~ adj (society or well or productively or “in place”))ti,ab. Age friendly ti,ab. Aging~ N5 wellbeing ti,ab. |
Combination | 1 AND 2 AND 3 |
Limit/filters | English, Slovenian, Portuguese, Finnish, German, Greek full-text language Published between 2000 and 2020 |
Records will be imported into Covidence, where duplicates not detected by the Covidence data management software will be manually removed by one reviewer. Remaining records will be screened by one reviewer, with independent screening being carried out by one of two other reviewers, first by title and abstract and subsequently by full-text. Any disagreements will be resolved through discussion, and, where necessary, a third reviewer.
Covidence will be used to manage citations and perform data extraction. A flow diagram using PRISMA-ScR guidelines will be generated to report the selection process and all results. Data will be extracted for all included studies by one reviewer and checked by one of two other reviewers. Authors will be contacted for additional information, if required.
The following fields will be extracted from the included studies:
(1) Author(s)
(2) Year of publication
(3) Country of origin
(4) Area/field of study
(5) Study population
(5a) Students (UG, PG, CPD, other, N/A)
(5b) Stakeholders (learners, older persons, educators, N/A)
(6) Aims/purpose of study
(7) Methodology (e.g. type of study)
(8) Key findings
(8a) Type of programme/course
(8b) Content/curriculum
(8c) Learning needs identified, and process to identify
(8d) Learning delivery and assessment
(8e) Assessment of learning impact
(8f) Barriers/facilitators to learning
(8g) Evaluation of the programme (result and evaluator details)
During the screening process, it is possible that concept- and context-relevant publications with differing themes and publication types will arise, where these publications may not “fit” into the extraction criteria above. In this event, appropriate extraction criteria will be developed to present this information.
Methodological quality will be independently assessed by two reviewers in articles where a defined research process can be identified. A tool developed by Hawker and colleagues will be used as it allows for the critical appraisal of studies of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method designs12. While quality assessment is not necessary for scoping reviews according to the JBI guidelines, it is recommended to improve the usefulness of the scoping review findings and to inform future research13.
As per the JBI methodology for scoping reviews10, the results of this scoping review will be presented in diagrammatic or tabular form, supported by a description that is in line with the objective of the review. The results will be accompanied by a narrative summary.
No data are associated with this article.
Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?
Partly
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Not applicable
References
1. Tomičić A, Malešević A, Čartolovni A: Ethical, Legal and Social Issues of Digital Phenotyping as a Future Solution for Present-Day Challenges: A Scoping Review.Sci Eng Ethics. 2021; 28 (1): 1 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: molecular epidemiology, postgraduate research, medical & biomedical education in the UK, healthy ageing, rare disease
Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?
Yes
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
No
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Competency-based geriatric and gerontology education; healthy aging curriculum development; educational program development and evaluation; diversity education; and behavioral health policy for older adults.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 12 Oct 22 |
read | |
Version 1 22 Nov 21 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Register with HRB Open Research
Already registered? Sign in
Submission to HRB Open Research is open to all HRB grantholders or people working on a HRB-funded/co-funded grant on or since 1 January 2017. Sign up for information about developments, publishing and publications from HRB Open Research.
We'll keep you updated on any major new updates to HRB Open Research
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)