Keywords
volunteering, older adults, sport, community sport organisations, active ageing
Volunteering is considered an effective way for older adults to stay active, connect with others and make a community contribution.
To conduct a scoping review to understand the extent and type of evidence reporting older adults’ experiences of volunteering in community sport organisations.
This review will include any research with adults aged 65 years and older exploring their experiences of volunteering (perceived benefits and challenges) in community sport organisations. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method studies will be included.
The review will be conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The following databases will be searched: PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, APA PsycINFO (from inception to present) as well as grey literature sources. Titles, abstracts and full texts will be screened by two reviewers. Relevant data will be charted using a standardised data charting tool developed for this review. Key information will be categorised and classified to generate a descriptive synthesis of the available research.
volunteering, older adults, sport, community sport organisations, active ageing
Globally, people are living longer (Rudnicka et al., 2020; United Nations, 2020; World Health Organisation, 2024). By 2050, it is projected that adults 65 years and older will comprise 16% of the global population (United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2020). In the European Union, people over 65 years will comprise 29% of the population by 2050 (Christensen et al., 2009; OECD, 2024a). It is estimated that there has been a gain of about 30 years in life expectancy in areas such as Western Europe, the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Japan, which is seen as one of the most important achievements of the 20th century. The worldwide trend towards populations ageing is changing the composition of societies, placing increased pressure on societies to adapt (Mitchell & Walker, 2020). The World Health Organisation (2024) raises the concern that this increase in life expectancy is often accompanied by increased years spent in ill health.
People who live longer in good health can participate in and significantly add to society. In a multi-wave American cohort study with 1,582 participants using a 1:1 prospective case–control design, data showed that older adults should be encouraged to be active physically, mentally and socially - therefore allowing them to maintain independence and continue contributing to society for as long as possible (Liebzeit et al., 2022). In qualitative research using in depth interviews in a Thai context, Wongsala et al. (2021) found that physical health in older adults was not solely measured by the absence of any illnesses, but it was also measured by the ability to stay active and maintain social networks. Similarly, in a Norwegian context, Krohne et al. (2023) reported that participants’ social ties and close relationships have a beneficial role for well-being in older age. Staying socially connected is essential to healthy aging, as it reduces the risk of cognitive decline, depression, and early mortality (Haslam et al., 2014; Holt-Lunstad et al., 2015).
Volunteering is one way for older adults to stay socially active, connect with others and make a community contribution. Voluntary work is defined as unpaid, non-compulsory work; the time individuals give without pay to activities performed either through an organisation or directly for others outside their own household (Hsu et al., 2023). The benefits of volunteering have been widely reported (Bradley, 1999; Connolly & O’Shea, 2015; Hamm-Kerwin et al., 2009; Nichol et al., 2024). A systematic review of 10 qualitative studies (Hsu et al., 2023) found that, for societies facing aging populations, voluntary work participation may be an important activity for aging well. An umbrella review of systematic reviews across 11 databases revealed a multitude of benefits of volunteering on mental, physical, and social health and well-being, particularly reduced mortality, and increased functioning, quality of life, pride, empowerment, motivation, social support and sense of community (Nichol et al., 2024). In a randomised controlled trial in Hong Kong, Yeung et al. (2025) demonstrated that volunteering conveyed beneficial effects on reducing loneliness in older adults. Having social supports was identified as a protective factor for both depressive symptoms and disorders in a scoping review of international literature by Wickramaratne et al. (2022), whose results suggested supports should be targeted at adults with low social support and elevated loneliness. Those with less social connections may benefit more from volunteering (Connolly & O’Shea, 2015).
Recent literature on volunteering has focused heavily on declining rates of volunteerism (Holtrop et al., 2024; Horsham et al., 2024; Pettigrew et al., 2020). Volunteering rates were declining in the years leading up to COVID-19, which then further reinforced a downward trend (OECD, 2024b). In a qualitative Canadian study of older adult sport volunteers, Hamm-Kerwin et al. (2009) argue that recruitment of volunteers for community groups continues to be one of the biggest challenges faced by community sport organisations. Establishing the downside to volunteering in community sport organisations may be difficult as those who have had negative experiences have probably already left the organisation (Misener et al., 2010). If recruitment and/or participation is to be improved, it is important to understand why people volunteer. Kort-Butler and Malone (2015) suggest that if volunteers are to be successful, impactful and continue their volunteering involvement, then the meaning of being a volunteer needs to be understood. Exploring stakeholder voices, including retired volunteers, in relation to volunteering has the potential to help improve volunteer recruitment and retention (Gaber et al., 2020).
There have been some individual studies, but no review which maps the evidence of older adult volunteers’ own experiences specifically in community sport organisations. Community sport organisations are commonly defined as non-professional, volunteer-run, and focused on participation, social interaction and community engagement rather than elite performance (Misener et al., 2010; Sport Australia, 2020). The proposed scoping review focuses on community sport organisations as the current study forms part of the lead author’s larger project with a specific community sports organisation in Ireland. In a report aimed at enhancing knowledge of the social dimensions of sport in Ireland and highlighting significance for public policy, Delaney and Fahey (2005) suggest that sport is the most important arena for volunteering in Irish society. Their research suggests that not only is sport a major promoter of volunteering, but also that volunteering is a major dimension of sport. Community sport organisations were also chosen as in Ireland these organisations represent one of the most numerous types of non-profit, membership-based organisations and attract the highest level of volunteer participation, with nearly 290,000 people, making sport the single most common voluntary sector (CSO, 2024).
A preliminary search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and JBI Evidence Synthesis was conducted and one systematic review on the topic was identified (Yi Chan et al., 2024), namely a qualitative systematic review of adults' (aged 50+) experiences volunteering in various forms of volunteer work. The proposed scoping review will differ, as it will (a) explore both qualitative and quantitative data regarding older adults’ experiences of volunteering [perceived benefits and challenges], (b) focus on older adults (65 years and older), and (c) specifically on volunteering in community sport organisations.
The aim of this scoping review is to chart what is known about older adults’ experiences of volunteering in community sport organisations. Appreciating the benefits and challenges for older adults in this setting may help to support their continued involvement as a volunteer. Furthermore, it will allow a better understanding of the potential to enrich the quality of life of older people through volunteering activities (Bradley, 1999; Misener et al., 2010; Ronkainen et al., 2022; Tsuji et al., 2022). Charting the available evidence is therefore necessary to guide future research and practice in this area.
Key terms defined are shown in Appendix 1.
This scoping review will identify the extent and type of evidence available on the experiences (perceived benefits and challenges) of older adults volunteering in community sport organisations.
Primary review question:
To identify and synthesise published research and grey literature on the experiences of older adults volunteering in community sport organisations, particularly focusing on perceived benefits and challenges.
Secondary review questions:
To map the methods used to investigate the experiences of volunteering
To identify the type of volunteering roles and community sport organisations that have been examined
To help to identify knowledge gaps in relation to the benefits and challenges of engaging older adult volunteers in community sport organisations
The review will consider studies that involve older adults (65 years and older) of all genders who volunteer in community sport organisations (non-commercial, not for profit organisations). Continuous volunteering will be the focus, not once off sport events.
Studies related to experiences of older adults volunteering in community sport organisations will be included, specifically focusing on perceived benefits or challenges. This will include those who volunteer and also those who have dropped out/discontinued.
Any studies of older adults’ experiences of volunteering in community sport organisations will be considered in this review.
This scoping review will consider both qualitative, quantitative and mixed method studies reporting on the experience of volunteering. This will include observational studies including prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies. Qualitative studies will also be included. Peer reviewed journals and grey literature in the English language will be included. Databases will be searched from their inception to the date of the final search.
A scoping review was deemed the most appropriate method to address the review question. Scoping reviews allow many sources of evidence to be included, including grey literature (Peters et al., 2021). This method will facilitate the mapping and synthesis of the literature on experiences of volunteering for older adults in community sport organisations, examine the main sources and types of evidence and help to identify knowledge gaps (Campbell et al., 2023; Mak & Thomas, 2022; Woo et al., 2023).
The review will be conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework methodology for scoping reviews (Peters et al., 2020). The review process includes defining the review objectives and questions, developing and refining the inclusion criteria, designing and implementing a comprehensive search strategy, and extracting and charting relevant data. The reporting of the scoping review will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA ScR) checklist to allow a structured and rigorous procedure to examine the literature (Page et al., 2021; Pollock et al., 2021). See Appendix 2.
A systematic search strategy will be developed in collaboration with an academic librarian. The text words contained in the titles and abstracts of relevant articles, and the index terms used to describe the articles will be used to develop a full search strategy. MeSH terms will be used. A search of PubMed, Medline, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, Scopus and APA PsycINFO from inception will then be undertaken to identify articles on the topic. A preliminary search, peer reviewed by a librarian, was conducted prior to writing this protocol, see Appendix 3. The search strategy, including all identified keywords and index terms, will be adapted for each included database and/or information source. The reference list of all included sources of evidence will be screened for additional studies. To ensure a comprehensive overview of the available evidence, grey literature will be searched alongside peer-reviewed sources. This will include targeted searches of Google and Google Scholar to identify relevant reports, guidelines, and policy documents. To identify potentially relevant grey literature, the first 100 search results pages of Google and Google Scholar will be screened to ensure comprehensive coverage of non-indexed and less visible sources. Key global organisations, such as the WHO and the United Nations (UN) will be searched directly for publications and data. All sources will be screened using the review’s inclusion criteria, and search strategies will be documented for transparency and reproducibility.
Following the initial search, all identified citations will be exported to Zotero and collated. Records will then be imported into Rayyan and duplicates removed. Titles and abstracts will be screened in duplicate by two independent reviewers for assessment against the inclusion criteria for the review. Potentially relevant sources will be retrieved in full and their citation details collated. The full text of selected citations will be assessed in detail against the inclusion criteria by two or more independent reviewers. Reasons for exclusion of sources of evidence at full text that do not meet the inclusion criteria will be recorded and reported. Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers at each stage of the selection process will be resolved through discussion, or with an additional reviewer. The results of the search and the study inclusion process will be reported in full in the final scoping review and presented in a PRISMA flow diagram (Moher et al., 2009).
Using the JBI framework (Pollock et al., 2022), data will be charted in three ways by: (a) extracting, (b) analysing and (c) presenting it in the scoping review. Data will be extracted from papers included in the scoping review by two or more independent reviewers using a data extraction tool developed by the reviewers. The extraction form will be piloted prior to the scoping review commencing - see sample form in Appendix 4. Examples of data to be extracted includes author/year, country, aim, study type/source (i.e. quantitative/qualitative), specific study methods, type of sport organisation, nature of volunteering, population/participants, sample size, age (yrs), gender, other demographics, setting, outcomes, results (see appendix 4).
The data will be presented graphically and in tabular format. A descriptive synthesis will accompany the tabulated results and will describe how the results relate to the reviews overall objective. The number and nature of studies will be the primary outcome as this will generate an overview of information related to older adults’ experiences of volunteering in community sport organisations. The overall review questions will be used to present results and, if appropriate, gaps in current knowledge will be identified. As this is a scoping review it is designed to identify the range of the evidence available and will be represented as a mapping of the identified studies and data, without particular reference to methodological quality of relevant studies (Cooper, 2016).
This scoping review will address the current gap on the extent and type of published research related to older adults’ experiences of volunteering in community sport organisations. As such, this scoping review will provide valuable information for policy makers, volunteering organisations, sporting organisations and healthcare providers. Specifically, the findings will inform future research on ways to support and enhance older adults’ engagement in and experiences of volunteering in community sport organisations.
No data is associated with this article.
Zenodo. Older adults' experiences of volunteering in community sport organisations: a scoping review protocol. 10.5281/zenodo.17080398. Wall et al. (2025) Older adults' experiences of volunteering in community sport organisations: a scoping review protocol
This project contains the following extended data:
Appendix 1. (Search terms)
Appendix 2. (PRISMA – ScR Checklist)
Appendix 3. (Search strategy for one database)
Appendix 4. (Sample data extraction table)
Data is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
This scoping review protocol is to contribute towards a doctoral degree award for OW.
The authors would like to especially thank Shauna Barrett, HSE Medical Librarian, Cork University Hospital for her time and assistance with reviewing the search strategy.
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Register with HRB Open Research
Already registered? Sign in
Submission to HRB Open Research is open to all HRB grantholders or people working on a HRB-funded/co-funded grant on or since 1 January 2017. Sign up for information about developments, publishing and publications from HRB Open Research.
We'll keep you updated on any major new updates to HRB Open Research
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)