Skip to content
ALL Metrics
-
Views
25
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article
Revised

Assessing the stability of psychobiological stress reactivity during adolescence: mixed-effect modelling of cortisol responses to laboratory stressors

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
PUBLISHED 24 Jan 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background

Puberty has been historically considered as a time of risk and vulnerability for young people. It is associated with rapid development in the hypothalamus, which is central in the production of both stress and sex steroids. While patterns of stress reactivity are calibrated in early life, this time of rapid development may provide a means for these patterns to change. This purpose of this study was to examine whether patterns of cortisol reactivity remained stable across one year of pubertal development, and whether variations in pubertal development impacted on this stability.

Methods

This study used a secondary dataset comprised of 102 adolescent-aged children and adolescents. Children and adolescents took part in the Trier Social Stress Test to elicit a physiological stress response. Cortisol reactivity was measured as the increase in salivary cortisol concentration taken at five time points throughout the session. Pubertal stage was measured by nurse report where possible, and parent/self-report otherwise and was used to calculate pubertal timing and tempo relative to peers. Measures of anxiety, BMI, and socio-economic status were taken and included in analysis.

Results

Results of a linear mixed-effect model found there to be a significant difference in cortisol reactivity over time, indicating that cortisol stress reactivity did not remain stable during this time (Estimate= 3.39, t=3.67, p<.001, CI[1.56, 5.22]). Additionally, results show children and adolescents who developed slower/quicker than peers displayed decreased stress reactivity (Estimate= -3.59, t=-2.13. p=.03, CI[-6.92, -0.25]).

Conclusions

This research contributes to a relatively small but consistent body of research noting pattern of increased cortisol reactivity during pubertal development. While a significant effect was found for pubertal tempo, this finding should not be considered indicative of any true effect.

Keywords

Stress, stress reactivity, puberty, pubertal development, pubertal timing, pubertal tempo, longitudinal

Revised Amendments from Version 1

The following changes have been made to the manuscript in response to reviewer comments. In the introduction, additional context has been added to better describe the novelty of the study, and to why the stability of the cortisol response is of particular importance during adolescent development. As noted by one reviewer, a similar study used a different analytic approach to calculating a similar phenomenon while using the same data set. The revised manuscript now provides justification for this difference in analytic method, clarifying that the present study is concerned with stress reactivity alone, rather than stress reactivity and recovery. In the revised methods section, additional clarity was provided in relation to the amount of time elapsed between each wave of measurement. This is now noted within the table as time measured in days. Additional information was also provided in relation to participant demographics, such as the ethnicity of participants. Where appropriate, changes at each wave of measurement are also noted, such as age, and justification has now been included to explain why the age range of participants differed by sex. Finally, a short discussion of the practical implications of these research findings has been added. The authors would like to express thanks to the reviewers once again for their thoughtful and helpful comments.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Angelika Ecker
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Megan R Gunnar

Introduction

Experiences and events that represent a challenge to a person typically elicit coping responses characterised by a pattern of neuroendocrine and behavioural changes. These changes include the stress response system, and the activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, with subsequent changes in cortisol. This change in cortisol, described as cortisol reactivity, has been associated with several dimensions of physical and psychological wellbeing across the lifespan (Turner et al., 2020). People with excessive, blunted and/or persistently high cortisol responses to stress, or individuals who are exposed to chronic and persistent stress responses are at risk of negative physical, emotional, and behavioural health issues (Adam et al., 2017; Beckie, 2012; Dickerson & Kemeny, 2004) as cortisol has effects across all body systems. Patterns of cortisol reactivity are calibrated by experiences and environmental context in early life, as information about environmental threat and opportunities are embedded in setpoints and reactivity patterns of psychobiological systems (Ellis et al., 2017). Recent evidence indicates that re-calibration of the cortisol stress response is possible (DePasquale et al., 2019; Engel & Gunnar, 2020; Gunnar et al., 2019; Peckins et al., 2015) and this plasticity may be enabled via the maturational processes occurring in the neural and endocrine systems at adolescence (DePasquale et al., 2021). The period of maturation during adolescence can open windows of opportunity that may reconfigure vulnerabilities linked to a recalibration of cortisol stress reactivity, and puberty has been highlighted as a biopsychosocial process that can reconfigure stress reactivity (Worthman et al., 2019).

Pubertal development

Puberty is a physiological process that enables and prompts change in the psychological and social life of the person; these biopsychosocial changes have been considered within both risk and protective frameworks (Chen & Raine, 2018; Hummel et al., 2013). The focus has often been on pubertal timing, or measurement of when children and adolescents reach specific physiological, hormonal, or other domain-dependent stages of pubertal development relative to their same age and sex peers (Mendle et al., 2010). Earlier or later onset of puberty has been linked to future and concurrent mental and physical health, for example, people, particularly girls, who commence puberty ahead of their peers are at greater risk of experiencing affect disorders (Galvao et al., 2014), behavioural problems (Dimler & Natsuaki, 2015), and health issues in later life (Day et al., 2015). Similar associations between earlier pubertal onset and adverse outcomes have also been observed in boys (Ullsperger & Nikolas, 2017), however, these negative outcomes may also be largely shaped by social contextual factors. For example, for boys with less harsh, more supportive parenting, earlier onset of puberty has been associated with enhanced social competence and positive psychosocial development, as well less aggressive behaviour (Klopack et al., 2019). In girls, timing has been shown to only predict aggressive behaviour when coupled with low maternal nurturance (Mrug et al., 2008). The interaction of parental relationships and pubertal timing has been observed in both boys and girls, with positive parenting moderating the relationship between off-time pubertal onset and adverse outcomes (Chen & Raine, 2018). These findings support the concept that health and behavioural outcomes are not solely determined by the physiological processes, or the timing or tempo of these alone, but rather situated within the context of the young person’s environment.

The impact of pubertal development on adolescent development has been examined in combination with stress responsivity, including as indexed by cortisol reactivity, and symptoms of depression have been predicted by an interaction of earlier puberty and heightened stress reactivity (Gong et al., 2019). Interestingly, one study found there to be a link between the timing of puberty, the patterns of cortisol reactivity, and the risk of depressive symptoms (Colich et al., 2015). Here, depressive symptoms were predicted by HPA hyporeactivity in those who began puberty earlier than their peers, and HPA hyperreactivity in those who had begun puberty later. What these studies may indicate, is that the timing of puberty is a complex, highly socially contextual process that is closely linked with outcomes related to stress.

Whereas pubertal timing is the onset of puberty relative to peers, pubertal tempo refers to the rate at which an individual progresses through puberty. There has been comparatively little research exploring the influence of pubertal tempo on biopsychosocial development, however research to date suggests that relatively fast or slow pubertal tempo may be associated with both depressive symptoms (Keenan et al., 2014; Mendle, 2014) and behavioural issues (Marceau et al., 2011). One recent systematic review of outcomes related to pubertal tempo found that while both boys and girls who experienced accelerated development had symptoms of depression during childhood and adolescence, there were distinct gender differences (Cheng et al., 2020). For instance, boys tended to experience more psychosocial difficulties due to accelerated development, for girls this was an opportunity to compensate for the impact of later onset puberty. These findings can be somewhat contradictory, and indicate there may be strong gender differences in the risk and protective factors associated with development (Mendle et al., 2010). In the context of cortisol reactivity, there is relatively little research examining the impact of pubertal tempo, however, accelerated development is associated with heightened stress reactivity, and this reactivity is associated with later depressive symptoms (Gong et al., 2019). It is important to note that while pubertal development and HPA maturation is associated with negative outcomes, some suggest that these should be treated as neither antecedents nor consequences of development, but rather as contributors to a system of accumulating risk, such as with allostatic load (Joos et al., 2018; Whelan et al., 2021). In other words, where pubertal timing and pubertal tempo can influence cortisol reactivity patterns, these exist within a wide system of opportunities for positive and negative growth.

Stability of cortisol reactivity during pubertal development

Patterns of cortisol secretion are reported to change during adolescence, with a normative increase in cortisol production, and differences in diurnal cortisol and cortisol reactivity partly explained by pubertal development, and differences in age and sex groups noted (Gunnar et al., 2009; Ji et al., 2016; Platje et al., 2013; Rotenberg et al., 2012). Because of this, adolescence provides a unique opportunity to study stability, as stability/instability is highly linked to this rapid development in the Hypothalamic Adrenal Pituitary axis, and the Hypothalamic Pituitary Gonadal axis, and offers a unique opportunity to study stability and change (Gunnar et al., 2019). The Pubertal Stress Recalibration Hypothesis (PSHR) describes the process wherein several bioecological and neurological factors, such as heightened plasticity in the hypothalamus, association cortex, and prefrontal cortex, and heightened sensitivity to socio-emotional environments, may allow for physiological responses to stress to be recalibrated during adolescence. There is some evidence from both cross-sectional (DePasquale et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2021) and longitudinal (Gunnar et al., 2019) studies to indicate a recalibration of cortisol responses in the context of positive social environments, at least in children and adolescents who experienced institutionalisation. However, there has been limited exploration of how cortisol reactivity or stability may be impacted by off-timing or off-tempo pubertal development. It is suggested that cortisol reactivity is influenced by the timing of puberty, with greater associations between off-time development and moderations in both stress reactivity and recovery (Smith & Powers, 2009). The current study examines the potential role of off-time and off-tempo pubertal development on the stability of cortisol reactivity to laboratory stress challenge across a period of adolescent development.

Methods

Participants

This study uses secondary data comprised of a sample of 135 participants collected as part of the 'Physiology of Puberty and Antisocial Behavior' project (NIMH:5R01MH058393-03). Initially, a comprehensive list of all children residing in specific zip code areas was obtained from the American Student List (ASL), a commercial organization that provides names of school-aged children and adolescents. The zip codes chosen belonged to the county where the research was conducted, as well as adjacent counties that were easily accessible to the laboratory. This recruitment process was inclusive of rural and semi-rural addresses located within a reasonable distance to the laboratory. A letter was sent to 966 parents, requesting their cooperation in the study and to be contacted by the research team. Following this, the research staff personally reached out to the parents through phone calls, seeking the child / adolescents' participation. Ultimately, 85 children and adolescents were enrolled based on the responses from their parents. Among the remaining children and adolescents, 584 could not be contacted due to returned letters and lack of forwarding contact information, while 89 others did not meet the inclusion criteria. Additional participants were recruited via flyers distributed throughout the community and through telephone responses to emails sent to university staff members. All these recruitment procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board at Pennsylvania State University.

This data set is comprised of biological, physiological, and psychological measures. Of the 135 included in the final data set, thirty-three were removed due to missing data in cortisol reactivity or pubertal measured. Participants included in the current study include 102 (49 boys, 53 girls) adolescent-aged children and adolescents. At the first wave of measurement, girls were aged 8, 10 or 12 years (Mean = 10.96, SD=1.66), and boys were aged 9, 11 or 13 years (Mean = 10.08, SD = 1.66). The difference in ages between sexes was to account for noted differences in the typical time young people enter puberty. All participants included in this study were free from chronic health problems and were not using any medication known to interfere with hormone levels. Participants were predominantly white (non-Hispanic) (94%), Hispanic (4%), African American (4%), and Asian (1).

A more detailed breakdown of this sample has been described previously (Susman et al., 2010), however, a summary of these details can be seen in the table below:

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics.

Wave 1Wave 2Wave 3
Mean Age (SD)10.51 (1.7)10.94 (1.7) 11.64 (1.7)
Age Range (lower, upper) 8, 138, 149, 15
Mean days elapsed since previous wave (SD)-197.6 (24.1) 186.4 (29.9)

This data set is comprised of biological, physiological and psychological measures collected over the course of three years. Participants included in the current study include 102 (49 boys, 53 girls) adolescent-aged children. At the first wave of measurement, girls were aged 8, 10 or 12 years (Mean = 10.96, SD=1.66), and boys were aged 9, 11 or 13 years (Mean = 10.08, SD = 1.66). All participants included in this study were free from chronic health problems and were not using any medication known to interfere with hormone levels.

Dependent variable

Cortisol reactivity. Cortisol reactivity was measured using salivary cortisol levels in response to the Trier Social Stress Test for Children/Adolescents (TSST-C) (Allen et al., 2017). The TSST-C is a test which elicits a stress response in participants by using both social evaluative and cognitive components. Children and adolescents were asked to come up with the end to a story in front of two judges and told that their answer would be compared to those of other children and adolescents their age. Prior to the commencement of the test, two samples were gathered to estimate a baseline measure of cortisol. After the administering of the task, three further samples were collected, first immediately after the task, then in ten-minute intervals. Cortisol reactivity is operationalised as the cortisol response to stress, measured as Area Under the Curve with respect to increase (AUCI) (Pruessner et al., 2003). This method provides a measure of change over time, as it ignores the distance from zero on all measurements, instead using baseline measures as a focal point for increase, and is thus more useful for increase response and acute measurement (Fekedulegn et al., 2007). A breakdown of demographics can be seen in Table 1. Previous research has opted to use a larger scale growth curve analysis to calculate cortisol response and recovery (Ji et al., 2016). These calculations provide a sensitive and robust model. However, this research is concerned with the overall production of cortisol response, relative to the baseline and so AUCi (Pruessner et al., 2003) was used.

Independent variables

Pubertal timing and tempo. Pubertal timing and tempo were calculated using pubertal stage. Pubertal stage was assessed by a paediatric research nurse during the research visit, and was operationalised following Tanner guidelines of genital stage and pubic hair stage for boys, and breast stage and pubic hair for girls (Marshall & Tanner, 1968), and included a self-report, parent report, and physical exam. To achieve this, the nurse first explained to the participants what each of the five stages of puberty included. The nurse then showed the parent and adolescent pictures of each of the five Tanner stages, and asked them to independently identify what stage of development the adolescent had reached. For this study, participant self-report of stage (genital for boys, breast for girls) was used in the analysis. Pubertal timing was calculated using a regression of pubertal stage on age of participants stratified by gender (Dorn et al., 2003; Dorn et al., 2006). The resulting residual value was then used as an index of pubertal timing – where a higher value indicates a later timing of puberty, and a lower value indicates an earlier timing of puberty. Pubertal tempo was calculated using linear growth curve estimation. This method was based on an adapted version of previous methods used (Marceau et al., 2011). To calculate individual tempo, each growth trajectory was modelled using linear growth curve estimation, and the total variance over time was used as an indicator of pubertal tempo.

Anxiety. Anxiety was assessed using participants Anxious/Depressed scores on the subcategory of the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) (Achenbach & Edelbrock, 1991). The CBCL is a checklist which measures problem behaviour and emotional problems in children and adolescents, and has been well-validated cross-culturally (Ivanova et al., 2007). The CBCL was completed by parents / guardians of the child and the parent data was used in this analysis.

Covariates. There are several other factors that may be relevant in examining the association of pubertal development with cortisol reactivity profiles, including Socio-economic status (SES) (Reiss, 2013; Vliegenthart et al., 2016), body-mass index (BMI) (Dockray et al., 2009), and sex. SES was determined using the Hollingshead four-factor index of social status (Hollingshead, 1975). The mean score for participants was 47 (SD = 12), out of a possible 66. BMI was calculated using the standard formula of weight (km)/height² (m²) at each wave of measurement. Measurements of height and weight were obtained through nurse reports during a physical exam, with an average of three measurements taken as the operant value.

Statistical analysis. All data analyses were conducted using the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 28. A linear mixed-effect model was used to examine whether there were any associations between cortisol reactivity to stress and each of the independent variables between each wave of measurement (West, 2009). The effects of SES, BMI, and sex were controlled for in the model. A summary of mean values of age, pubertal timing, pubertal tempo, cortisol reactivity, BMI, and anxiety can be seen in Table 2 below.

Table 2. Results and descriptives.

MeanSD
OverallBoysGirlsOverallBoysGirls
Age10.510.9610.081.711.651.65
Pubertal timing-.151-.17-.134.737.644.815
Pubertal tempo.564.398.717.764.536.901
Wave 1Wave 2Wave 3Wave 1Wave 2Wave 3
Cortisol Reactivity-2.022.714.233.896.957.12
BMI20.0520.6421.284.74.966.34
CBCL Anxiety2.221.671.562.952.162.19

Results

Stability of cortisol reactivity across adolescence

There was a significant difference in cortisol reactivity to stress between timepoints (Estimate= 3.39, t=3.67, p<.001, CI[1.56, 5.22]). We observed a general trend of increasing cortisol reactivity from wave 1 (Mean=-2.02, SD=3.89) to wave 3 (Mean = 4.23, SD =7.12) of data collection (Estimate=3.39, t=3.67, CI[1.56, 5.22]) (see Table 3).

Table 3. Results of the mixed-effect linear model.

ParameterEstimateStd ErrordftPLower CIUpper CI
Time3.38891.924304115.9183.666.000*1.558195.21962
Pubertal Timing2.705071.70016133.6791.591.114-.6576306.06777
Pubertal Tempo-3.585671.68430123.009-2.129.035*-6.91964-.251696
CBCL Anxiety-.023065.341428150.678-.068.946-.69767.651539

Impact of pubertal timing and tempo on this relationship

There was no direct significant effect of pubertal timing or anxiety on cortisol reactivity profiles over time, although we did observe a significant main effect of pubertal tempo on cortisol activity (Estimate= -3.59, t=-2.13. p=.03, CI[-6.92, -0.25]). We found that more rapid pubertal tempo was associated with a reduced cortisol reactivity profile, however the width of confidence interval limits meaningful inference.

Discussion

Historically, it was generally accepted that cortisol production remains relatively stable during puberty, displaying a normative pattern of increase throughout development with factors such as age and sex influencing differentiations in cortisol stability (Gunnar et al., 2009; Ji et al., 2016; Platje et al., 2013; Rotenberg et al., 2012). This time was conceptualised as a period of risk and vulnerability, where children and adolescents were susceptible to negative orientations in physiological responses to stress risk and the development of psychopathologies (Roberts & Lopez-Duran, 2019). There is an emerging perspective within developmental psychobiology which states that while there is increased risk and vulnerability during the adolescent transition, this time may also be conceived as a time of opportunity and positive development. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether cortisol response to stressors, as a measure of stress reactivity, remained stable across a period of pubertal development. Additionally, this study aimed to examine whether pubertal timing and/or pubertal tempo influenced any observed change in reactivity while controlling for anxiety. We found that cortisol reactivity was not stable across the timepoints of measurement, observing a general trend wherein cortisol reactivity increased over time. This result is consistent with the normative pattern of change in cortisol secretion during adolescence development (Gunnar et al., 2009; Platje et al., 2013; Rotenberg et al., 2012). Importantly, previous research examining the stability of cortisol reactivity during adolescence has found similar results, despite using a separate analytic method. This is likely due to this normative pattern of increasing initial response, and variations in response.

There was no significant direct impact of either pubertal timing, or pubertal tempo on cortisol reactivity indicated in the results. One possible reason for this is the homogeneity of the sample used; children and adolescents in this study shared similar backgrounds, few could be considered as disadvantaged. This is important as contemporary literature suggests that the current social environments of young people plays a crucial role in determining later developmental outcomes (DePasquale et al., 2019). Here, regardless of whether there has been experience of adversity in early life, the coupling of rapid development during puberty with positive social environments provides an opportunity for recalibration of previously atypical responses to stressors (Gunnar et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2021). For these reasons, these results should not be considered indicative of the lack of relationship between pubertal development and cortisol reactivity stability, and future research is needed using a more diverse sample to further examine this relationship.

We acknowledge that the study has limitations which require caution in considering the findings. Firstly, the sample used in this study is both too small, and too homogenous to derive any indication of the true effect in the population. This is important when considering the differences in both stress reactivity and puberty that may be associated with social contextual or individual aspects such as SES. Secondly, the total time difference between the first and final wave collection was one year. While this is theoretically enough to observe some pattern of instability, there is a potential loss of variability, and this method cannot account for variability of pubertal tempo. It is possible that in this sample that variability in change existed across the time points, and thus, more research is warranted investigating the stability of acceleration (and deceleration) of puberty, and how this may impact upon cortisol reactivity. One strategy with potential to do this is to integrate different measures of pubertal timing (Dorn et al., 2006; Mendle, 2014), which would allow for. One of the primary strengths of this study, however, is that to the best of our knowledge, no longitudinal research has been conducted which investigates the direct relationship of both pubertal timing and tempo on the stability of cortisol reactivity and this study provides a foundation for further research.

In summary, we found that cortisol reactivity was not stable across time points. While our secondary hypothesis, that pubertal timing and tempo would significantly influence this instability was not supported, the results suggest that off-time or off-tempo pubertal development should not necessarily be considered as singular, or interactive, predictors of atypical cortisol stress reactivity to stress. Instead, it is more likely that these factors exert effects within a complex biopsychosocial system of risk and protection during adolescence. These findings are therefore important to the context of developing practical intervention programmes for young people, as literature suggests there is a strong association between the timing of these positive social environments and later outcomes For researchers studying the effect of experience, including young people’s engagement with enrichment and other programmes, it is important to consider how psychobiological measures of stress may change as much via pubertal development, as they may as a response to the programme or intervention. Looking forward, further focus should be placed on identifying and understanding the interconnected biological, physiological and environmental mechanisms which underpin this normative process of cortisol reactivity instability and change.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 25 Apr 2024
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
VIEWS
356
 
downloads
25
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
O'Shea J, Dockray S and Susman E. Assessing the stability of psychobiological stress reactivity during adolescence: mixed-effect modelling of cortisol responses to laboratory stressors [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. HRB Open Res 2025, 7:26 (https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13874.2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 24 Jan 2025
Revised
Views
4
Cite
Reviewer Report 18 Feb 2025
Kathleen C McCormick, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 4
The present manuscript explores the associations between cortisol reactivity and pubertal development, specifically analyzing the role of pubertal tempo. The authors utilized secondary data with methods that were well-suited for the research question, using the gold-standard measurement for puberty and ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
McCormick KC. Reviewer Report For: Assessing the stability of psychobiological stress reactivity during adolescence: mixed-effect modelling of cortisol responses to laboratory stressors [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. HRB Open Res 2025, 7:26 (https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15328.r45058)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
2
Cite
Reviewer Report 07 Feb 2025
Jost Ulrich Blasberg, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 2
The authors present an interesting secondary study on cortisol reactivity across adolescence and its’ association with pubertal timing and tempo. This is a novel research question, as most studies have solely focused on the role of pubertal stage.

... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Blasberg JU. Reviewer Report For: Assessing the stability of psychobiological stress reactivity during adolescence: mixed-effect modelling of cortisol responses to laboratory stressors [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. HRB Open Res 2025, 7:26 (https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15328.r45055)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
5
Cite
Reviewer Report 28 Jan 2025
Jessica Buthmann, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA 
Not Approved
VIEWS 5
In this study the authors endeavored to test whether cortisol reactivity, as measured by the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), was stable over a period of one year in a sample of adolescents. Although this is a worthwhile research question, ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Buthmann J. Reviewer Report For: Assessing the stability of psychobiological stress reactivity during adolescence: mixed-effect modelling of cortisol responses to laboratory stressors [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. HRB Open Res 2025, 7:26 (https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15328.r45052)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
5
Cite
Reviewer Report 27 Jan 2025
Angelika Ecker, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany 
Approved
VIEWS 5
The authors have put significant effort and dedication into revising the manuscript, which has greatly contributed to ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Ecker A. Reviewer Report For: Assessing the stability of psychobiological stress reactivity during adolescence: mixed-effect modelling of cortisol responses to laboratory stressors [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. HRB Open Res 2025, 7:26 (https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15328.r44986)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
5
Cite
Reviewer Report 25 Jan 2025
Megan R Gunnar, Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA 
Approved
VIEWS 5
The authors were very responsive to my ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Gunnar MR. Reviewer Report For: Assessing the stability of psychobiological stress reactivity during adolescence: mixed-effect modelling of cortisol responses to laboratory stressors [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. HRB Open Res 2025, 7:26 (https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15328.r44985)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 25 Apr 2024
Views
12
Cite
Reviewer Report 18 Jun 2024
Angelika Ecker, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 12
Thank you very much for the opportunity to review this manuscript on the stability of cortisol reactivity during pubertal development. The authors investigated the change in cortisol reactivity in children of both sexes over the course of a year using ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Ecker A. Reviewer Report For: Assessing the stability of psychobiological stress reactivity during adolescence: mixed-effect modelling of cortisol responses to laboratory stressors [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. HRB Open Res 2025, 7:26 (https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15210.r40365)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 24 Jan 2025
    Jen O'Shea, School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, T12 K8AF, Ireland
    24 Jan 2025
    Author Response
    Dear Dr Ecker, 

    I would like to thank you on behalf of the authors for your thoughtful and helpful comments. 

    Please our responses to these comments below. 

    ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 24 Jan 2025
    Jen O'Shea, School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, T12 K8AF, Ireland
    24 Jan 2025
    Author Response
    Dear Dr Ecker, 

    I would like to thank you on behalf of the authors for your thoughtful and helpful comments. 

    Please our responses to these comments below. 

    ... Continue reading
Views
18
Cite
Reviewer Report 04 Jun 2024
Megan R Gunnar, Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA 
Not Approved
VIEWS 18
Overall, this is an interesting re-analysis of data on cortisol reactivity previously presented by Ji et al,   In this re-analysis, the purpose is to :
This purpose of this study was to examine whether patterns of cortisol reactivity remained ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Gunnar MR. Reviewer Report For: Assessing the stability of psychobiological stress reactivity during adolescence: mixed-effect modelling of cortisol responses to laboratory stressors [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. HRB Open Res 2025, 7:26 (https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15210.r40037)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 24 Jan 2025
    Jen O'Shea, School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, T12 K8AF, Ireland
    24 Jan 2025
    Author Response
    Dear Professor Gunnar, 

    I would like to thank you for your time, and for your very helpful comments. 

    Please find individual responses to each of your comments/suggestions below.  ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 24 Jan 2025
    Jen O'Shea, School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, T12 K8AF, Ireland
    24 Jan 2025
    Author Response
    Dear Professor Gunnar, 

    I would like to thank you for your time, and for your very helpful comments. 

    Please find individual responses to each of your comments/suggestions below.  ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 25 Apr 2024
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Are you a HRB-funded researcher?

Submission to HRB Open Research is open to all HRB grantholders or people working on a HRB-funded/co-funded grant on or since 1 January 2017. Sign up for information about developments, publishing and publications from HRB Open Research.

You must provide your first name
You must provide your last name
You must provide a valid email address
You must provide an institution.

Thank you!

We'll keep you updated on any major new updates to HRB Open Research

Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.