Keywords
Interpersonal and Communication Skills, Soft Skills, Nursing Preceptorship, Preceptorship Education and Training, Pedagogy
Interpersonal and Communication Skills, Soft Skills, Nursing Preceptorship, Preceptorship Education and Training, Pedagogy
The preceptorship model is a teaching and learning strategy frequently employed internationally to educate undergraduate and graduate nursing students in the clinical environment. Billay & Myrick’s (2008, pg. 259) defines preceptorship as:
“an approach to the teaching and learning process within the context of the practice setting which allows students to develop self-confidence while increasing their competence as they become socialised into the profession of nursing”.
Acknowledging that up to 50% of undergraduate nursing curriculums take place in the clinical environment, the preceptorship model plays a pivotal role in the education of student nurses (McSharry & Lathlean, 2017; NMBI, 2016a; NMC, 2018). The preceptorship relationship is a purposeful short-term professional partnership in the practice setting between the preceptor (staff nurse) and a nursing student (preceptee) and is based on the provision of providing patient care. Hence within the preceptorship model, there are three members: the preceptor, the student nurse, and the patient, forming a triadic professional relationship. This relationship provides opportunities for nursing students’ socialisation into nursing practice and helps to integrate theory into practice, under the guidance of the preceptor (McSharry & Lathlean, 2017; Muir et al., 2013; Ward & McComb, 2017). The Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland (NMBI, 2016b) states that effective interpersonal relationships are not only essential for the foundation of effective patient care but also a successful teaching and learning environment. Therefore, the quality and support within this relationship contribute significantly to nursing student’s socialisation into the nursing profession and their learning (Ward & McComb, 2017) whilst also ensuring quality patient care and patients’ satisfaction in their nursing care (Suikkala et al., 2020a). Thus, the formation of a therapeutic interpersonal relationship between the preceptor, nursing student and patient is essential.
Kornhaber et al. (2016 pg. 537) define a therapeutic interpersonal relationship between the nurse and patient as:
“a relationship which is perceived by patients to encompass caring, and supportive non-judgmental behaviour, embedded in a safe environment during an often-stressful period”.
The authors believe that Kornhaber et al.’s (2016) definition of a therapeutic interpersonal relationship can also be applied to the interpersonal relationships between the preceptor and nursing student in which a preceptor provides non-judgmental support and guidance to the nursing student, creating a positive therapeutic professional relationship. Typically, a positive therapeutic relationship portrays characteristics of good interpersonal competence with meaningful dialogue that displays warmth, friendliness, genuine interest, respect, and empathy, while at the same time responding to patients’ emotions and having a desire to provide support and care (Dinç & Gastmans, 2013; Kornhaber et al., 2016; Prip et al., 2018).
In light of the increasing complexity of healthcare delivery, the importance of effective interpersonal relationships between the preceptor, nursing students and patients has grown exponentially. The literature emphasises the benefits of effective interpersonal and communication skills but also highlights the consequences of negative interpersonal interactions. Effective interpersonal relations have been shown to play a pivotal role in building trusting relationships and creating a caring and welcoming environment in nursing (Arnold & Boggs, 2020). This thereby improves communication between the preceptor, nursing student and patient, leading to person-centred care, patient satisfaction, patient empowerment and decreases adverse events among patients (Suikkala et al., 2020a; Suikkala et al., 2020b). Effective interpersonal relations also facilitate the development of knowledge, skills acquisition, and theory- practice integrations for nursing students (Irwin et al., 2018; Ke et al., 2017; Omer & Moola, 2019; Ward & McComb, 2017; Washington, 2013).
However, the literature to date also widely documents negative interpersonal relationships within this professional educational relationship and the clinical environment. Reports from both preceptors and nursing students exist regarding workplace incivilities such as rudeness, humiliation, anger, generational clashes, and inappropriate criticism from experienced preceptors (Dyess & Sherman, 2009; Gardiner & Sheen 2016; Omer & Moola, 2019). These challenging experiences consequently result in a negative learning experience for the student and, in some cases, interpersonal conflict occurs due to a breakdown in the preceptorship relationship (Hugo & Botma, 2019; McCloughen & Foster, 2018). Furthermore, it has been reported that displaying poor interpersonal skills, where there is a lack of emotional intelligence demonstrated by preceptors and student nurses, can result in negative feelings amongst patients, leading to a lack of trust and a possible breakdown in the relationship (Holst et al., 2017; Mukumbang & Adejumo, 2014). As educators, this is concerning to the authors, as fragmented relationships can have not only a negative impact on the student nurses’ learning experience but also on patient care (Cho et al., 2017; Suikkala et al., 2018; Suikkala & Leino-Kilip, 2005).
As with any human skill, interpersonal and communication skills, also referred to as “soft skills” can be improved through conscious effort (Moss, 2020). McConnell (2004, pg. 178) describes soft skills as “those essential skills involved in dealing with and relating to other people, largely on a one-to-one basis”. These include the ability to get along with others at a personal and professional level, and display levels of empathy towards the situation that others may be experiencing (Grant & Goodman, 2019). This process stimulates feelings of support, comfort, and recognition in individuals (Wright, 2007). Enhancement of interpersonal skills concerns several key components, including the individuals’ emotional intelligence, learning to recognise the uniqueness of everyone, empathising with the individual, learning to listen, effective communication, empowering others and building trust (Grant & Goodman, 2019).
Teaching effective interpersonal and communication skills requires providing the relevant knowledge, as well as guiding and coaching learning to develop and enhance these skills. It takes time and experience to build effective interpersonal and communication skills, beginning with foundational skills, for example, knowing when to use open-ended and closed-ended questions. More advanced listening skills paired with sensitivity and empathy generate highly effective interpersonal relationships (Pavord & Donnelly, 2015). Investing in developing preceptors’ interpersonal and communication skills is essential in maintaining good interpersonal relationships, an effective teaching environment and exemplary patient care. Preceptors not only have the responsibility of role modelling effective soft skills but also evaluating student nurses’ competencies in these skills as part of their clinical assessment document (NMBI, 2016a).
Teaching effective interpersonal and communication skills to preceptors requires providing the relevant knowledge, as well as guiding and coaching their learning to develop and enhance these skills. Therefore, the inclusion of such skills is paramount in preceptorship education and training programmes. Preceptors bring their own distinctive set of communication skills, cultural influences, learning styles and life experiences that directly affect their ability to engage in effective interpersonal relationships (Gardiner & Sheen, 2016). Nurse educators must build on preceptors’ strengths and experiences to enhance their interpersonal skills. A preceptor short of adequate interpersonal and communication skills cannot facilitate positive interpersonal relationships with the nursing students and patients (Martinez-Linares et al., 2019). Interpersonal and communication skills are practical skills. Therefore, nursing educators need to adapt teaching strategies that involve activities which allow opportunities for active participation to develop such skills, e.g., experiential learning opportunities (Reid-Searl et al., 2017). Pedagogical approaches observed in the literature include simulation practices such as the use of puppets (Reid-Searl et al., 2017), standardised patients (Lin et al., 2013; Maclean et al., 2017), real patients (Perry et al., 2013) and roleplay (Jackson & Back, 2011; Pearson & McLafferty, 2011). Other methods observed included clinical placement (Purdie et al., 2008), group discussions (Waugh et al., 2014), online discussion (Deering & Eichelberger, 2002), and audiotapes (Sloan, 2003).
The existing evidence outlined provides an overview of the importance of interpersonal and communication skills, particularly in the context of a nursing preceptorship relationship. This literature highlights the need for active development of these skills in preceptorship education and training programmes. However, an initial inspection of the literature demonstrates that the focus of interpersonal and communication skills development centres around nurse-patient relationships and is predominantly completed as part of an undergraduate nursing programme. Given the importance of effective interpersonal and communication skills for preceptors in not only facilitating and guiding such skills among nursing students and the patients, the authors feel it is therefore worthwhile to systematically examine the literature to identify what teaching strategies are being implemented to develop interpersonal and communications skills among trainee preceptors (qualified nurses). It is also important to determine if trainee preceptors are being afforded the opportunity to specifically develop interpersonal and communication skills required to facilitate and guide the triadic preceptorship relationship between the nurse, student nurse and patient.
A scoping review protocol will outline the approach that will be adopted to determine the available literature on the pedagogical approaches to developing interpersonal and communication skills among nursing preceptors as part of their preceptorship education and training programme.
An exploratory scoping review approach will be employed to establish the nature and extent of knowledge relating to pedagogical approaches in preceptorship education and training programmes for the development of interpersonal and communications skills among trainee preceptors. Scoping reviews are used to map the concepts underpinning a research area and the primary sources and types of evidence available (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005). Scoping reviews present a broad overview of the evidence concerning a topic and are beneficial when investigating areas that are emerging to clarify key concepts, definitions and identify gaps (Lockwood et al., 2019; Page & Moher, 2017). Scoping reviews are also implemented to examine the breadth of the literature, as well as the conduct of research on a specific topic to inform the design of future research studies (Lockwood et al., 2019).
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there are currently no scoping reviews examining the educational practices of nurse educators in developing interpersonal and communication skills among trainee preceptors. Therefore, the findings of this exploratory review will contribute to existing literature regarding current pedagogy for interpersonal and communications skills development in preceptorship education and training programmes. The findings of this review may benefit the wider society, considering that interpersonal relationships of a preceptorship not only play an essential role in providing effective patient care, but also in facilitating nursing education in the clinical environment. It will also contribute a theoretical and empirical basis for the future development of pedagogical approaches that aim to enhance interpersonal and communication skills in preceptorship education and training programmes. The scoping review protocol introduced by Arksey & O’Malley (2005) that encompasses a six-stage iterative framework, as well as Peters et al. (2020) updated approach to conducting scoping reviews, will guide this review protocol and subsequent scoping review.
The overall aim of the scoping review is to identify, explore and map the literature regarding the development of interpersonal and communication skills for preceptors as part of their preceptorship education and training programme.
This will be achieved by addressing the following objectives:
1. Determine the extent and nature of existing literature on the development of interpersonal and communication skills in preceptorship education and training programmes, so that the literature can be examined and mapped out, to identify any gaps.
2. Examine current educational practices for the development of interpersonal and communication skills in preceptorship education and training programmes, to identify any educational practices that are worthy of further consideration for future research.
Peters et al. (2020) state that a clear scoping review question should incorporate elements of the PCC mnemonic (population, concept, and context). In this instance, qualified nursing staff (trainee preceptors/preceptors) are the relevant population, the concept is educational practices for interpersonal and communication skills development, and the context is preceptorship education and training programmes in acute/residential clinical settings. The research question that will therefore guide this scoping review is:
“What is known about the development of interpersonal and communication skills amongst trainee nursing preceptors in preceptorship education and training programmes?”
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist framework guidelines introduced by Tricco et al. (2018) will also guide the systematic scoping review. These guidelines are recommended to enhance transparency and quality of the completed scoping review (McGowan et al., 2020), and will help the researchers and the readers develop a greater understanding of the evidence. The research team will undertake a comprehensive search of the literature within the following databases:
CINAHL Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL Plus)
SCOPUS (Elsevier Publications)
Academic Search Complete (EBSCOhost)
APA PsycINFO (American Psychological Association)
Education (ERIC)
Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) three-step process for applying a search strategy will be implemented (Peters et al., 2020). Firstly, an initial search was deployed on CINAHL Plus, the identification of search terms was conceptually based on an oriented search to identify key text words used to address the major concepts which include population (preceptors), concept (interpersonal and communication skills development), and context (nursing preceptorship education and training programme). Synonyms for each of the concepts will also be included. Each search strategy will be adapted to the functionality of each database using specific Boolean operators, truncation markers, and MeSH headings where necessary to broaden the search and capture all literature that may use such terms. McGowan et al. (2020) state the input of a research librarian is invaluable when carrying out a scoping review; the authors worked with an expert university librarian (D.S.) in designing and refining the search strategy. Table 1 outlines the keywords for each search string.
As per the second stage of the JBI search strategy protocol, the same keywords from Table 1 will be searched in the remaining aforementioned databases. During this stage, the research team will review and ‘hand search’ the reference list to identify any additional relevant studies. Given that this is an exploratory scoping review, the authors are interested in identifying all literature including RCTs, exploratory studies and discussion papers. Therefore a “web search” of the grey literature will also be conducted using “OpenGrey” and “Google Scholar”. Specific educational policy publications by regulatory and professional bodies for preceptorship education and training programmes will also be searched to examine the focus of interpersonal and communication skills required for a preceptorship role. Table 2 outlines the search terms for grey literature and regulatory and professional bodies for preceptorship education and training programmes.
Source and Link | Search terms |
---|---|
Open Grey http://www.opengrey.eu/ In subject: Humanities, psychology, and social sciences | Preceptorship interpersonal and communication skills Education and Training (First 10 pages) |
Google Scholar https://scholar.google.com/ | Preceptorship interpersonal and communication skills Education and Training (First 10 pages) |
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland (NMBI) https://www.nmbi.ie/Standards-Guidance | Preceptorship Interpersonal relationships Interpersonal and communication skills |
Nursing and Midwifery Council (England) https://www.nmc.org.uk/ | Preceptorship/Mentorship/Practise Supervisors Interpersonal relationships Interpersonal and communication skills |
Health Education England https://www.hee.nhs.uk/our-work/preceptorships | Preceptorship/Mentorship/Practise Supervisors Interpersonal relationships Interpersonal and communication skills |
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/ | Preceptorship Interpersonal relationships Interpersonal and communication skills |
Canadian Nurses Association https://www.cna-aiic.ca/en | Preceptorship Interpersonal relationships Interpersonal and communication skills |
Each search will be systematically documented (date, search terms, results per string) and saved by two independent authors (PH, AD), with the resulting findings of the searches compared and then imported into Mendeley (1.19.6 / 2020), a bibliographic reference manager, where any duplicates of literature will be removed before the initial screening of title and extract is divided out and screened by all of the authors. Covidence screening and data extraction software tool (www.covidence.org) will be utilised by the authors for screening. Each article will be required to be approved by two independent screeners before either being included or excluded in the review. A pilot testing of articles (n=50) using Covidence software package and inclusion and exclusion criteria will be undertaken by the authors to ensure consistency of the methodology adopted in the selection process (Peters et al., 2020). Full text screening will then be carried out on all articles that meet the inclusion criteria during the initial screening round by two independent authors (PH, CR). For any articles in which a disagreement may arise a third independent author (AL) known as the “tie-breaker” will further review the article against the inclusion criteria to settle the difference of opinion. The number of articles identified, screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review will be captured using the Covidence software package. A PRISMA flow diagram will be created to ensure transparency of reporting, decisions for the exclusion of studies permitting replication and comparison of any further studies.
The Inclusion and exclusion criteria, highlighted in Table 3, will be developed through an iterative process based on the PCC elements of the review question, plus a specification of the types of studies that have addressed the scoping review question and discussions amongst the authors (McKenzie et al., 2020). The primary author will record any changes. All authors will utilise and adhere to its criteria during the screening process to ensure consistency.
In this stage, a data extraction form will be created by the lead author (PH) (Table 4) based on JBI (2020) data charting form, mapping it with the objectives and research question of the scoping review (Peters et al., 2020) and piloted on two articles by all authors. Any changes to the chart will be documented and reported in the final scoping review for transparency in the reporting.
Each data charting form will be logged electronically using Microsoft Excel to capture relevant information for each study and will be available for all members of the research team via a shared drive. All authors will discuss the data before a descriptive analysis commences. As recommended by Peters et al. (2020), the analysis of data extracted should not involve any more than descriptive analysis to achieve the desired outcomes of a scoping review. Therefore, a narrative report will be produced, using a deductive thematic analysis approach summarising the extracted data concerning the objectives and scoping review question, for example, the pedagogy adopted for interpersonal and communication skills development and the impact of such training on trainee preceptors. Identification of areas in which a gap in the literature exists will also be reported. Quality appraisal of studies will not be conducted, as this review aims to explore the general scope of research conducted in the field of interpersonal and communication skills development in preceptorship education and training programmes and identify current pedagogical practices implemented to contribute a theoretical and empirical basis for the future development of preceptorship education and training programmes.
Initial findings from the scoping review will be presented to several stakeholders. The primary author (PH) will disseminate the results of the review with local academic networks within the authors’ place of work (third level institution) and associated clinical settings. The author will specifically report the findings to Clinical Placement Coordinators (CPC), who typically develop and facilitate preceptorship education and training days in the clinical settings in Ireland. The primary author will also share the results at the Clinical Skills Network of Ireland in which he is a stakeholder to reach a national targeted audience. The authors will engage with these groups to share and discuss our findings and interpretations to capture their perspective on the evidence identified. The Lead author also aims to deliver an oral or poster presentation at National and International conferences such as the International Nursing & Midwifery Research and Education Conference, scheduled for March 2022. Finally, the authors aim to publish the scoping review findings in a peer-reviewed journal for a wider communication of the results. All data generated and analysed during the scoping review will be included in the published scoping review article; including search results, list of included studies, data extraction spreadsheets and final results, to ensure transparency and reproducibility of the review.
This scoping review protocol has been designed in line with the latest literature and evidence (Arksey & O’Malley’s, 2005; Peters et al., 2020; Tricco et al., 2018) to create and perform a systematic scoping review. The distinguishing features of a scoping review will permit the authors to answer the specified research question, applying a systematic and evidence-based approach to identify the current knowledge on educational practices for the development of interpersonal and communication skills as part of preceptorship education and training programmes. It will also permit the authors to identify gaps in our knowledge base in this field which could justify new research and also inform the design, conduct and reporting of future research.
While this scoping review will not formally evaluate the quality of evidence available, it will provide an overview of the available literature that will inform the researcher on current educational practices for the development of interpersonal and communication skills as part of preceptorship education and training programmes. This knowledge may identify the gaps in training that are contributing to interpersonal conflicts in preceptorship relationships that are widely reported throughout the literature. Only articles in English will be used; however, there will be no restrictions on the country of origin where the publications were produced, which should therefore provide a diverse range of opinions and experiences. Following the open peer-review process and achieved approval, the authors will commence the systematic scoping review.
No data are associated with this article.
Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?
Yes
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Not applicable
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Education of Healthcare Professionals, Integrated Programmatic Assessment, Self-regulated Learning, Teaching Evidence-based Practice, Cancer Care.
Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?
Yes
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Not applicable
References
1. Myall M, Levett-Jones T, Lathlean J: Mentorship in contemporary practice: the experiences of nursing students and practice mentors.J Clin Nurs. 2008; 17 (14): 1834-42 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: clinical education, digital learning, internationalisation
Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?
Yes
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Not applicable
References
1. Carlson E: Precepting and symbolic interactionism--a theoretical look at preceptorship during clinical practice.J Adv Nurs. 2013; 69 (2): 457-64 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Higher Health Care Education, Learning theories, Preceptorship, Clinical Training, Methodology, Interprofessional Collaboration and learning, Educational models.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 2 (revision) 11 Mar 21 |
|||
Version 1 28 Jan 21 |
read | read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Register with HRB Open Research
Already registered? Sign in
Submission to HRB Open Research is open to all HRB grantholders or people working on a HRB-funded/co-funded grant on or since 1 January 2017. Sign up for information about developments, publishing and publications from HRB Open Research.
We'll keep you updated on any major new updates to HRB Open Research
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)