Skip to content
ALL Metrics
-
Views
35
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Open Letter

Parental involvement in a multidisciplinary PhD programme in neonatal brain injury

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 25 Jun 2020
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Public and Patient Involvement collection.

Abstract

Parental and patient and public involvement (PPI) involvement is a core element of the Neonatal Brain Consortium Ireland Ireland (NBCI) since its inception. PPI  representatives were critical to the development of the Consortium and the animations for parent information as well as the NEPTUNE Neonatal Encephalopathy PhD programme in which they are core members involved in PhD supervision, publications, study days and educational outreach. Key outputs have also included national clinical guidelines and parent information.

Keywords

neonatal encephalopathy, PPI, newborn

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s). Publication in HRB Open Research does not imply endorsement by the Health Research Board of Ireland.

Rationale, aim, scope of project

Neonatal brain injury is a common cause of mortality and disability. Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is one of the commonest causes of neonatal brain injury in full term infants. For every baby that dies from NE, another will survive with significant lifelong disability. A recent systematic review estimated that in 2010, 1.15 million babies developed neonatal encephalopathy directly related to intrapartum asphyxia with 287,000 deaths, 233,000 infants surviving with moderate/severe disability and 181,000 living with mild impairment. This represents a massive global burden of disease, as these children develop their injury at the very beginning of life. It is estimated that worldwide, NE leads to 50.2 million DALYS each year1. A recent Health Research Board Ireland (HRB) Collaborative Doctoral Award to researchers in our Neonatal and Children’s Brain Consortium Ireland (NBCI) has shown that even infants with mild encephalopathy can have cognitive impairments at 5 years of age. There is an urgent need to study this population in greater detail and to establish the cause of brain injury so that ultimately, it can be prevented.In this project we aimed to create a unique national collaborative multidisciplinary research group including parents to optimise the investigation and management of neonatal brain injury. All babies with brain injury routinely get an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan and brain monitoring with an electroencephalogram (EEG) as well as detailed developmental progress. We planned to develop unique expertise in these techniques as well as newer advanced methods. The joint supervision of the PhD students allows a new generation of expertise to be developed in Ireland and join international groups to allow integrated care and further research progress in the future. Researchers in this consortium have internationally recognized multidisciplinary expertise in neonatology, paediatrics, neurodevelopment, family-centred care, clinical trials and methodology, pharmacology, epidemiology, biostatistics, translational research and neuroimaging in neonatal brain injury. PhD students experience the holistic overview of research in this area involving the entire translational paradigm from basic science research, translational clinical research, clinical trials to epidemiology and population health while getting in depth expertise in their chosen area.

Aims

Neonatal brain injury has a multifactorial aetiology and causes significant neurological morbidity such as cerebral palsy2. The only treatment available is therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for term infants with encephalopathy but morbidity and mortality rates remain high3. There is an urgent need for adjunctive therapies to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes. This project aims to combine the international expertise of a multidisciplinary group to improve the outcomes of infants with Neonatal Brain injury and strengthen collaborative links including neonatal neurointensive care and followup.

Design how and which patients and health professionals were invited to join and work with/in the project (or if patient led how were health professionals approached to mount a joint project) How did you decide who to include and how did you approach them?

The National Parent organisation the Irish Neonatal Health Alliance (INHA) were invited through a longterm contact (MD) to participate as a patient and public involvement (PPI) group on the project from grant application stage. The INHA has extensive PPI experience on both the national and international platforms and provided 5 board members for the PPI roles on the project. The PPI group were co-applicants and collaborators on the grant and wrote their relevant grant sections as well as reviewing the entire proposal. In addition, the successful funding application involves a group including psychology, neonatology, neuroscience, electrophysiology, midwifery and statisticians and experts on clinical trials methodology. This leveraged an existing close network of health researchers/practitioners and included a programme coordination role for Clinical Research Development Ireland alongside related activities such as the Wellcome-HRB Irish Clinical Academic Training Programme.

Implementation

The resulting HRB Neonatal Encephalopathy PhD Training Network (NEPTuNE) comprises five PhD projects. The PPI group were involved as follows: student interview process, active members of the Steering Committee, regular participants in Study Days and advocates for the project at other meetings. Each PPI member is connected to one of the five PhD projects as a member of the supervisory team. This involvement has had a significant impact on the direction of our research, from the initial input to the funding application, selecting motivated students, further development of projects during collaborative Study Days and strategic focus for NEPTuNE and the NBCI. PPI members have also been involved in creating two animations for parents on therapeutic hypothermia and also on the Neonatal Intensive care unit. These meetings were helpful to allow the entire research team to understand the concerns of parents. We discussed each project as well as the motivation for all participant’s involvement and planned outputs from discovery to clinical guideline implementation and family information.

Evaluation/impact

We are particularly proud of the amazing involvement of all team members and the generosity of the PPI group in attending the clinical workshops in MRI, EEG, Clinical evaluation, core outcome data sets and also in interviewing the PhD candidates. This has resulted in an open discussion on all aspects of the projects relating to families and enhances plans for dissemination. In particular we are revising some of the consent and information forms for routine MRI in the NICU. We found having a group who communicate well with us and each other is ideal and it means the same parents are not obliged to contribute constantly. This also increases the sustainability of the group.

We have held an annual national Neonatology meeting for 10 years which has a morning session hosted by the National Parent Organisation (INHA) and an afternoon scientific session targeting medical health care professionals with international guest speakers to both events. We also ensure that at every workshop and meeting a PPI representative will give a presentation and is involved in the programme development4.

Lessons learnt

Initially we were concerned that PPI involvement would inadvertently have a coercive element and place an extra burden on families. However by communicating by email, phone and with occasional face to face meetings after the first few introductions we have managed to involve sites all over Ireland with less impact on all collaborator time. In addition the project co-ordinator organises the teaching and communication between the group. Increased funding for meetings and opportunities to financially compensate the PPIs (all of whom work on a voluntary basis for the INHA) would enhance integration of families.

Future directions

We plan a series of papers on family reflections for the journal Pediatric Research5,6 written by the PPI group as well as ongoing guideline development and parent information with the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland. We are also co-writing a multidisciplinary paper with core PPI involvement related to the importance of sleep and circadian rhythms in the NICU as they are also experienced in publishing7. We will start a PPI forum every 6 months to the executive committee to get valuable feedback and updates on appropriate involvement on the project. We have strong interdisciplinary links in Europe with the European Society for Paediatric Research (ESPR) and the European Foundation for the Care of Newborn infants (ECFNI) which is the first pan-european organisation and network to represent the interests of preterm and newborn infants and their families. We also hope to develop Family centred care in Neonatology and also advance neonatal neurointensive care in collaboration with our international partners in Johns Hopkins University, USA. This project has potential to be extended to preterm infants. Preterm infants are also at high risk of brain injury particularly cerebral palsy and neurodevelopmental delay.

Key messages

  • Personal contacts and previous collaborations are really helpful

  • Core involvement as co-applicants and access to the grant as it is written

  • Continued involvement in project development, programme governance and co-writing manuscripts

Data availability

Underlying data

No data is associated with this article

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 25 Jun 2020
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
VIEWS
649
 
downloads
35
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Molloy EJ, Daly M, Ryan P et al. Parental involvement in a multidisciplinary PhD programme in neonatal brain injury [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. HRB Open Res 2020, 3:40 (https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13009.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 25 Jun 2020
Views
13
Cite
Reviewer Report 16 Nov 2020
Brigitte Vollmer, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 13
This in interesting and timely open letter, of interest to a large audience of clinicians and researchers in the field. 

I have a few comments and I feel these should be addressed prior to indexing:
    ... Continue reading
    CITE
    CITE
    HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
    Vollmer B. Reviewer Report For: Parental involvement in a multidisciplinary PhD programme in neonatal brain injury [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. HRB Open Res 2020, 3:40 (https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.14101.r28214)
    NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
    Views
    21
    Cite
    Reviewer Report 29 Jun 2020
    David Sweet, Regional Neonatal Unit, Royal Maternity Hospital, Belfast, UK 
    Approved with Reservations
    VIEWS 21
    This paper sets out to describe the benefits of parental involvement at all stages of a major research project, from conceptualisation and grant application, through interviewing of prospective PhD students and supervision of the projects.

    The paper ... Continue reading
    CITE
    CITE
    HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
    Sweet D. Reviewer Report For: Parental involvement in a multidisciplinary PhD programme in neonatal brain injury [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. HRB Open Res 2020, 3:40 (https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.14101.r27586)
    NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

    Comments on this article Comments (0)

    Version 1
    VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 25 Jun 2020
    Comment
    Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
    Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
    Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
    Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

    Are you a HRB-funded researcher?

    Submission to HRB Open Research is open to all HRB grantholders or people working on a HRB-funded/co-funded grant on or since 1 January 2017. Sign up for information about developments, publishing and publications from HRB Open Research.

    You must provide your first name
    You must provide your last name
    You must provide a valid email address
    You must provide an institution.

    Thank you!

    We'll keep you updated on any major new updates to HRB Open Research

    Sign In
    If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

    The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

    Email address not valid, please try again

    You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

    To sign in, please click here.

    If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

    You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

    To sign in, please click here.

    If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

    Code not correct, please try again
    Email us for further assistance.
    Server error, please try again.