Keywords
neonatal encephalopathy, PPI, newborn
This article is included in the Public and Patient Involvement collection.
neonatal encephalopathy, PPI, newborn
The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s). Publication in HRB Open Research does not imply endorsement by the Health Research Board of Ireland.
Neonatal brain injury is a common cause of mortality and disability. Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is one of the commonest causes of neonatal brain injury in full term infants. For every baby that dies from NE, another will survive with significant lifelong disability. A recent systematic review estimated that in 2010, 1.15 million babies developed neonatal encephalopathy directly related to intrapartum asphyxia with 287,000 deaths, 233,000 infants surviving with moderate/severe disability and 181,000 living with mild impairment. This represents a massive global burden of disease, as these children develop their injury at the very beginning of life. It is estimated that worldwide, NE leads to 50.2 million DALYS each year1. A recent Health Research Board Ireland (HRB) Collaborative Doctoral Award to researchers in our Neonatal and Children’s Brain Consortium Ireland (NBCI) has shown that even infants with mild encephalopathy can have cognitive impairments at 5 years of age. There is an urgent need to study this population in greater detail and to establish the cause of brain injury so that ultimately, it can be prevented.In this project we aimed to create a unique national collaborative multidisciplinary research group including parents to optimise the investigation and management of neonatal brain injury. All babies with brain injury routinely get an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan and brain monitoring with an electroencephalogram (EEG) as well as detailed developmental progress. We planned to develop unique expertise in these techniques as well as newer advanced methods. The joint supervision of the PhD students allows a new generation of expertise to be developed in Ireland and join international groups to allow integrated care and further research progress in the future. Researchers in this consortium have internationally recognized multidisciplinary expertise in neonatology, paediatrics, neurodevelopment, family-centred care, clinical trials and methodology, pharmacology, epidemiology, biostatistics, translational research and neuroimaging in neonatal brain injury. PhD students experience the holistic overview of research in this area involving the entire translational paradigm from basic science research, translational clinical research, clinical trials to epidemiology and population health while getting in depth expertise in their chosen area.
Neonatal brain injury has a multifactorial aetiology and causes significant neurological morbidity such as cerebral palsy2. The only treatment available is therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for term infants with encephalopathy but morbidity and mortality rates remain high3. There is an urgent need for adjunctive therapies to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes. This project aims to combine the international expertise of a multidisciplinary group to improve the outcomes of infants with Neonatal Brain injury and strengthen collaborative links including neonatal neurointensive care and followup.
The National Parent organisation the Irish Neonatal Health Alliance (INHA) were invited through a longterm contact (MD) to participate as a patient and public involvement (PPI) group on the project from grant application stage. The INHA has extensive PPI experience on both the national and international platforms and provided 5 board members for the PPI roles on the project. The PPI group were co-applicants and collaborators on the grant and wrote their relevant grant sections as well as reviewing the entire proposal. In addition, the successful funding application involves a group including psychology, neonatology, neuroscience, electrophysiology, midwifery and statisticians and experts on clinical trials methodology. This leveraged an existing close network of health researchers/practitioners and included a programme coordination role for Clinical Research Development Ireland alongside related activities such as the Wellcome-HRB Irish Clinical Academic Training Programme.
The resulting HRB Neonatal Encephalopathy PhD Training Network (NEPTuNE) comprises five PhD projects. The PPI group were involved as follows: student interview process, active members of the Steering Committee, regular participants in Study Days and advocates for the project at other meetings. Each PPI member is connected to one of the five PhD projects as a member of the supervisory team. This involvement has had a significant impact on the direction of our research, from the initial input to the funding application, selecting motivated students, further development of projects during collaborative Study Days and strategic focus for NEPTuNE and the NBCI. PPI members have also been involved in creating two animations for parents on therapeutic hypothermia and also on the Neonatal Intensive care unit. These meetings were helpful to allow the entire research team to understand the concerns of parents. We discussed each project as well as the motivation for all participant’s involvement and planned outputs from discovery to clinical guideline implementation and family information.
We are particularly proud of the amazing involvement of all team members and the generosity of the PPI group in attending the clinical workshops in MRI, EEG, Clinical evaluation, core outcome data sets and also in interviewing the PhD candidates. This has resulted in an open discussion on all aspects of the projects relating to families and enhances plans for dissemination. In particular we are revising some of the consent and information forms for routine MRI in the NICU. We found having a group who communicate well with us and each other is ideal and it means the same parents are not obliged to contribute constantly. This also increases the sustainability of the group.
We have held an annual national Neonatology meeting for 10 years which has a morning session hosted by the National Parent Organisation (INHA) and an afternoon scientific session targeting medical health care professionals with international guest speakers to both events. We also ensure that at every workshop and meeting a PPI representative will give a presentation and is involved in the programme development4.
Initially we were concerned that PPI involvement would inadvertently have a coercive element and place an extra burden on families. However by communicating by email, phone and with occasional face to face meetings after the first few introductions we have managed to involve sites all over Ireland with less impact on all collaborator time. In addition the project co-ordinator organises the teaching and communication between the group. Increased funding for meetings and opportunities to financially compensate the PPIs (all of whom work on a voluntary basis for the INHA) would enhance integration of families.
We plan a series of papers on family reflections for the journal Pediatric Research5,6 written by the PPI group as well as ongoing guideline development and parent information with the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland. We are also co-writing a multidisciplinary paper with core PPI involvement related to the importance of sleep and circadian rhythms in the NICU as they are also experienced in publishing7. We will start a PPI forum every 6 months to the executive committee to get valuable feedback and updates on appropriate involvement on the project. We have strong interdisciplinary links in Europe with the European Society for Paediatric Research (ESPR) and the European Foundation for the Care of Newborn infants (ECFNI) which is the first pan-european organisation and network to represent the interests of preterm and newborn infants and their families. We also hope to develop Family centred care in Neonatology and also advance neonatal neurointensive care in collaboration with our international partners in Johns Hopkins University, USA. This project has potential to be extended to preterm infants. Preterm infants are also at high risk of brain injury particularly cerebral palsy and neurodevelopmental delay.
The NEPTuNE Group
Core Partners
1. Eleanor Molloy, Professor of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
2. Arun Bokde, Professor of Neuroimaging, Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
3. Declan Devane, Professor of Midwifery/Director of HRB-Trials Methodology Research Network, National University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
4. Deirdre Murray, Professor of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
5. Miss Mandy Daly, Director of Advocacy and Policymaking, Irish Neonatal Health Alliance, Bray, Ireland
6. Elizabeth Nixon, Assistant Professor in Developmental Psychology, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
7. Geraldine Boylan, Professor of Neonatal Physiology, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland
8. Dr Mark Watson, Head of Education and Development, Clinical Research Development Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
9. Mr Paul Ryan, Board member of Irish Neonatal Health Alliance, Bray, Ireland
10. Ms Fiona O’Farrell, Paediatric Occupational Therapist
11. Ms Sharon Keogh, Director & Co-founder of Irish Neonatal Health Alliance; Founder of Monoamniotic Twins Ireland
12. Ms Elaine Ni Bhraonáin, Irish Neonatal Health Alliance, Bray, Ireland
Associate Partners
1. Nicola Robertson, Professor of Neonatology. University College London, UK
2. Frances Northington,
3. Consultant Neonatologist Co-Director, Neurosciences Intensive Care Nursery, Professor of Paediatrics, John Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
4. Eugene Dempsey, Professor of Neonatology, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland
5. Rhodri Cusack, Thomas Mitchell Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
6. John Murphy, Professor of Neonatology & Chair of National Neonatal Therapeutic Hypothermia Committee, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
7. Martin White, Professor and Chair of National Neonatal Advisory Group, Royal College of Physicians Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
8. Dr Deirdre Sweetman, Consultant Neonatologist, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
9. Adrienne Foran, Professor and Consultant Neonatologist, the Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
10. Dr David Sweet, Consultant Neonatologist, The Royal Belfast Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland
11. Ms Siobhan Horkan, Adminstrator and organisor of National Therapeutic Hypothermia Group, Ireland
12. Paul Corcoran, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and Department of Epidemology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
13. Dr Veronica Dongohue, Consultant Paediatric Radiologist, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
14. Dr Jean Quigley, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
15. James Meaney, Director of CAMI and Professor of Radiology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
16. Dr Joanne Balfe, Consultant Paediatrician, Tallaght Hospital and Laura Lynn Hospice, Dublin, Ireland
17. Dr David Webb, Consultant Paediatrician Neurologist, Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital & Tallaght Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
18. Gunter Shumann, Professor and Chair in Biological Psychiatry; Director, Centre for Population Neuroscience and Stratified Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
Is the rationale for the Open Letter provided in sufficient detail?
Partly
Does the article adequately reference differing views and opinions?
Partly
Are all factual statements correct, and are statements and arguments made adequately supported by citations?
Yes
Is the Open Letter written in accessible language?
Partly
Where applicable, are recommendations and next steps explained clearly for others to follow?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Neonatal and Paediatric Neurology ; Developmental Neurology; Brain development after early acquired brain injury. advanced MRI.
Is the rationale for the Open Letter provided in sufficient detail?
Partly
Does the article adequately reference differing views and opinions?
Yes
Are all factual statements correct, and are statements and arguments made adequately supported by citations?
Yes
Is the Open Letter written in accessible language?
Yes
Where applicable, are recommendations and next steps explained clearly for others to follow?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Noeonatal clinical trials, respiratory distress syndrome.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 25 Jun 20 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Register with HRB Open Research
Already registered? Sign in
Submission to HRB Open Research is open to all HRB grantholders or people working on a HRB-funded/co-funded grant on or since 1 January 2017. Sign up for information about developments, publishing and publications from HRB Open Research.
We'll keep you updated on any major new updates to HRB Open Research
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)